#07/1

Permanent URI for this collection

https://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/24982

Browse

Browsing #07/1 by Subject "admissibility of evidence"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ПРАВОВОГО ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ДОКАЗІВ ДЕРЖАВНОЮ ПРИКОРДОННОЮ СЛУЖБОЮ УКРАЇНИ В АДМІНІСТРАТИВНОМУ ПРОВАДЖЕННІ. THE MAIN PECULIARITIES OF LEGAL ADJUSTING FOR THE USE OF EVIDENCE BY THE STATE BORDER GUARD SERVICE OF UKRAINE IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
    (2021) ФРАНЧУК, Тетяна Анатоліївна; FRANCHUK, Tetiana
    Розкрито сутність та особливий характер доказів в справах про адміністративні проступки. Доведена особливість застосування окремих видів доказів органами Державної прикордонної служби України в адміністративному провадженні. Сучасний стан розвитку законодавчого забезпечення адміністративного провадження, яке здійснюється органами та посадовими особами Державної прикордонної служби України (далі – ДПСУ) охоплює майже всі без виключення аспекти, ефективності реалізації мети адміністративної відповідальності – невідтворного притягнення до неї винної особи. Розкрито особливості організаційно-правового регулювання окремих видів доказів та способів доказування. Зроблено висновки про підвищення ефективності доказування та використання доказів Державною прикордонною службою України в адміністративному проваджені. The current state of legislative support of administrative proceedings, which is carried out by bodies and officials of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine (hereinafter – SBGSU) covers almost all aspects without exception, the effectiveness of implementation of the goal of administrative responsibility – irreproducible bringing the guilty person to it. However, there are also certain objective shortcomings associated with the peculiarities of implementation by the SBGSU of its powers in the field of state border protection, as well as the evolution of social relations and technological development, the rate of which is much higher than the development of legislative support. It is about the organizational and legal support of the process of use of evidence and implementation of the very process of proving in cases of administrative proceedings of the State Tax Service of Ukraine. It is noted that more extensive use will be made of electronic means of obtaining information in the case, fixing offenses, databases with information on the legal basis for a person's stay in Ukraine, as well as electronic evidence and means of proof. This is due to the high level of responsibility of the State Tax Service of Ukraine as a body protecting the state border of Ukraine. At the same time, when completing the protocol on an administrative offence, it is necessary to fully and comprehensively determine what means of evidence have been obtained, what kind of evidence and what it proves. Also, such type of evidence as personal explanations and testimonies of officials of the State Tax Service of Ukraine are widely used, especially if the detention of a person takes place outside of control points and checkpoints. Therefore, such testimonies and evidence require detailing in the protocol on administrative proceedings with an indication of the potential or availability of evidence in support of the facts stated. Accordingly, organizational and legal provision of evidence in the considered type of administrative cases requires systematization, which can be achieved by including norms and provisions that regulate relevant aspects in the activities of the State Border Service of Ukraine in the Instruction on registration by officials of the State Border Service of Ukraine of materials on administrative offences, approved by the Order of the MIA of Ukraine from 18/09/2013 № 898. There were disclosed the essence and special nature of evidence in cases of administrative misconduct. It was investigated the peculiarity of the use of certain types of evidence by the bodies of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine in administrative proceedings. There were determined the peculiarities of organizational and legal regulation of certain types of evidence and methods of proof. It was made a conclusion on increasing the efficiency of proving and using evidence by the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine in administrative proceedings.