2015 рік

Permanent URI for this community

https://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/796

Browse

Browsing 2015 рік by Author "Дегтяренко, М."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Психологічне консультування як напрям забезпечення судової діяльності.Counselling as a way of ensuring judicial activities.
    (2015) Дегтяренко, М.
    Здійснено аналіз правових норм, наукових джерел та судової практики щодо залучення психолога-консультанта до діяльності судових органів. Досліджено психологічні питання, що виникають у сфері правосуддя та в кадровій роботі суду, зокрема щодо залучення особи, яка має ґрунтовні психологічні знання, у тому числі психолога-консультанта.Осуществлен анализ правовых норм, научных работ и судебной практики по приобщению психолога-консультанта к деятельности судебных органов. Исследованы психологические вопросы, возникающие в сфере правосудия и в кадровой работе суда, в том числе относительно привлечения лица, имеющего глубокие психологические знания, в том числе психолога-консультанта.This article is dedicated to analysis of the legal norms, scholarly sources and litigation of the consultant psychologist involvement in the judiciary. Investigation, that took place in this article rise up psychological issues that arise immediately upon the administration of justice within court personnel work. Which make it possible effective and promising option for solution of those issues – involving a person, who possesses profound psychological knowledge in the form of a psychologist-consultant. One that will provide the fundamental principles of justice and positive reform of the judicial system in order to improve the effectiveness of judicial institutions. Absence of practice of bringing in of psychologist-consultant to the trial, regardless of category of businesses, predefined by the row of reasons. First from them it is possible to admit insufficiency of lineation at legislative level of judicial status of psychologist-consultant, his rights and duties, tasks and functions in a trial and others like that. However, it is necessary to mark that, as a legislator limits neither possible actions nor forms of participation of psychologist in rule-making, then his participating in many cases is the real and possible without any changes or additions of current legislation. In sub-normative acts and at official interpretation it costs to give mind judges in relation to possibility of bringing in of psychologists-consultants during realization of judicial actions, especially in connection with originality of behavior of persons in relation to which judicial actions come true.